Saturday, June 20, 2020

Meet Me in the Middle


I feel like we’ve all heard it, or perhaps even said it ourselves. “Did you read the comments?” followed by an eye roll or exasperated sigh, which inevitably leads to a discussion of how horribly people speak to each other over social media. Who hasn’t seen an article or a post from a friend on a topic where the comment section runs away in one of the threads? Sometimes rooted in fact, sometimes drenched in unadulterated opinion. If I see a comment has more than four replies, more than likely things have gotten spicy, especially if the topic was a hot-ticket item to begin with. Ironically, some of the people I see or hear talk the most about “other” people being the problem are frequently the ones entering discussions with guns blazing. Most of the time I prefer not to get involved as it makes me unbelievably anxious to have people upset with me. However, 2020 is turning out to be a (I think this is the technical term) “real bag of dicks”, which is enhancing the less appealing aspects of social media. And rather than give up hope on the idea of Civil Dialogue, I want to help be part of the change I want to see. Step 1: share opinions. *GULP*

I think the very first thing we have to acknowledge is that there are a LOT more people in the middle ground than are vocal on social media. To be clear, I don’t mean that people are neutral or somehow politically in the middle. I mean that if we were to imagine opinions and the way you engage in dialogue as a spectrum that people slide along rather than concrete sides, such as Left vs. Right or Democrat vs. Republican, I think you would find that most people are toward the center, not the extremes, and are willing to engage in civil conversation without name calling or attempting to pigeon-hole everyone into an assumed opinion box. If you think in terms of absolutes such as ‘conservative or liberal’, ‘racist or antiracist’, or even (as is often the observed case) ‘wrong or right’, you are not allowing for the very real nuances that make up opinions, people, and real life.

I can already sense the pushback, “But some people ARE wrong!” Obviously, sweetums. We do, after all, live in a world with Flat Earthers, bless their hearts. So let’s go with that for a minute. Let’s say that you see someone comment something that facts dispute (“facts” = not quotes from your favorite news anchor on CNN or Fox). What should you do? Do you call them out? I see a lot of talk right now about ‘calling people out’. What does that mean though? That you tell them they’re a huge piece of shit? That they’re stupid for thinking that? Or does it mean that you present facts and, without bias, show where the flaws are in the statement they made. I mean, maybe it’s just me, but I would feel very differently if you commented on something I posted and said, “The problem with that statement is….” rather than, “Listen up, trash panda. If you weren’t liberal/a Republican/promiscuous, you’d see that it’s murder/you’re racist/wrong.”

Another thing I see frequently is, “If you think ­_________, then fuck off/immediately unfriend me.” I disagree strongly with both of those statements. For starters, what then? The world’s magically better? That person disappears? They still live in this country, they still live in our communities, and they are still (most likely) registered voters who have a say in our society. If you want things to be different, then we need each other. Do you just want to be heard? Make sure everyone knows how you feel? Or are you really, genuinely trying change their mind? To be clear, there are definitely those whose mind is NOT going to change and they are hurtful in what they say. If you need to unfriend or unfollow them for your own mental health, I absolutely understand. But those extreme unchangeable minds are more like 10-20% on either end of the spectrum. When you tell someone in the extremes to unfriend you for having a different opinion, what you really do is shut down conversation and questions from everyone else in the middle who sees you post that. Same thing when it comes to name calling. I’ve had questions before and wanted to get in on conversations, but the way even some of my friends and family talk to people on their posts (or in person, unfortunately) has intimidated me to the point I stay silent. I also want to point out that some of the people I see do this the most are the same ones posting stuff about “It’s ok to change your mind when presented new information, it’s called growing.” Well why the hell would they think it’s ok to do that when you told them they were stupid and to unfriend you? I’ve got whiplash from watching all the mixed messages fly by.

If you’ve made it this far, you may be thinking this sounds like I’m on an incredible high horse that I ride around to change people’s minds. Bless you, but no. I say this because I have changed my mind on things, important things, throughout my life; I’ve been the person on the other side of the argument who was misinformed on the topic. I may not have continued to engage in those conversations and read the material presented to me if people came at me in a hostile way or made me feel stupid for not immediately being enlightened. Was it someone else’s job to hold my hand or educate me? Absolutely NOT! Did it help though that people presented facts about the topic rather than opinions about me? No doubt about it. There’s also a 50/50 chance inception is real and has been used on me. Conversation 1: was not ready to hear, but the seed was planted. Conversations 2- present: learned a little more each time, refined opinion based on new information. (Conversation 150: jumps out window because top is still spinning.)

If we want social media to be a place where things can be discussed civilly, then we need to agree on how we talk about things, not which opinions are correct. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, but I think the following would help go a long way:

1.     Lose the mindset ‘this is going to be ugly’ simply because it’s difficult. This is something I am working on myself, as too often I see a post I want to comment on but don’t because I assume it will be a train wreck. Why though? Why does it HAVE to be ugly? It takes two to tango, so to speak, and am I incapable of phrasing things in a respectful way? There have been a few times lately where I’ve changed my thinking from “this will be ugly” to “this feels uncomfortable, but doable” and it’s made a helpful difference.

2.       Would you say it in real life? I feel like everyone sees examples of this, no matter what their timeline looks like. A tragic accident, a misfortune, etc. where a stranger felt the need to throw in their two cents and flame someone just because they could. If you wouldn’t say it to someone’s face, then you probably don’t need to throw it out on the internet. But also, a necessary follow up question is, are you an asshole in real life? Because if you are, you probably need to just sit this one out too. I know people that are unbelievably kind in real life but their internet persona is the troll under the bridge. Don’t be this person.

3.       Set norms and expectations – then hold to them! If you are posting something potentially spicy (we all know our own social media friends and followers, you know if something is going to stir up your crowd), feel free to set norms or expectations of dialogue in the beginning and delete comments that don’t meet that criteria (whether against your opinion OR for) with a reminder of the expectations. I saw an incredible example of this done the other day. A Facebook friend deleted someone’s comment but immediately commented and let him know she deleted the comment as she carefully vets her information sources and what he’d shared had been proven to be false. She handled it very tactfully and respectfully, and what was great is that he came back and engaged in a very civil dialogue with her for multiple comments afterward. She established a norm, was very respectful in holding her commenters to that norm, and it allowed for productive dialogue. One thing I see from time to time is that people will delete harsh comments from those on the other side of the argument, but not those supporting their side. Unbiased norms and consistent enforcing of those norms may not stop the more extreme commentators but it may help others feel safe in engaging in your posts.

4.       No one brings a knife to a gun fight. Ok, I know that’s not how the saying actually goes, but my point is, if I come out guns blazing, then others are going to also come out guns blazing, they won’t try anything less. If I make a post or a comment that comes across very aggressive, I’m probably going to get more of the same from anyone who engages with me. I have seen multiple conversations online in the past month alone where the person who made the original post took a very confrontational tone, did not appear to try to hear what others said if they disagreed, and then was genuinely confused when someone got upset or thought they were mad. If we can’t look at our own behavior, why are we trying to “call out” others?

I don’t know that this is the answer or that it will solve any problems but I certainly hope it provides a starting point. Because God knows I am emotionally exhausted from watching passionate, kind people tear each other apart on social media. Maybe this will be something I change my mind on, maybe more conversations will help refine my opinion a little bit. Or maybe I’ll end up in a cabin in the woods with no wi-fi, living my best life. It’s sixes, really.